vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SM Energy Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($704.9M vs $630.0M, roughly 1.1× Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.). On growth, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.3% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs -4.2%).
Park Hotels & Resorts is an American real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on hotel properties, based in Tysons, Virginia. It was formed in 2017 as a spin-off from Hilton Worldwide.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
PK vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $630.0M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $12.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 121.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $630.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $629.0M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $610.0M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.0M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $630.0M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $625.0M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.0M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.0M | $634.6M |
| Q1 26 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-205.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.0M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.0M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $210.3M |
| Q1 26 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.04 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.29 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $156.0M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $156.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $232.0M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $278.0M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $480.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $449.0M | $487.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $6.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.0M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.0M | $476.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.59× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.83× | 2.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PK
| Comparable Hotel Revenues | $617.0M | 98% |
| Other | $13.0M | 2% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.