vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $113.3M, roughly 1.6× SITIME Corp). SITIME Corp runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 7.0%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.3% vs 28.6%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs 38.9%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
PLOW vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.5M | $113.3M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 56.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 1.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | 66.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.3% | 148.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $184.5M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.3M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.1M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.4M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.9M | $43.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.7M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0K | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $-28.7M |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 53.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | -106.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | -61.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | -86.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.09 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.36 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $-1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $-1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $144.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $281.4M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $626.7M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $144.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $281.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.2M | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.8M | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.7M | $692.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.2M | $696.2M |
| Q4 25 | $626.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $694.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $671.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.0M | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0M | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.6M | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.0M | $878.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.1M | $942.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.9M | $25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.8M | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 50.3% | 11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.47× | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $63.6M | $35.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.9M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.4M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.4M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-181.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.6M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $92.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.0K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.4M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.47× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.41× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
