vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) and ATRenew Inc. (RERE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $43.2M, roughly 1.2× ATRenew Inc.). ATRenew Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.9% vs -106.3%, a 123.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.

ATRenew Inc. operates a leading pre-owned consumer electronics transaction and servicing ecosystem primarily in China. Its core services include end-to-end device recycling, professional quality inspection, certified refurbishment, and resale of smartphones, laptops, tablets and other digital products, serving both individual consumers and enterprise clients across domestic and select Southeast Asian markets.

PLYM vs RERE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PLYM
PLYM
1.2× larger
PLYM
$51.2M
$43.2M
RERE
Higher net margin
RERE
RERE
123.2% more per $
RERE
16.9%
-106.3%
PLYM

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2023

Metric
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Revenue
$51.2M
$43.2M
Net Profit
$-54.4M
$7.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-102.5%
Net Margin
-106.3%
16.9%
Revenue YoY
-1.4%
Net Profit YoY
-248.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.23

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
$51.2M
Q2 25
$47.2M
Q1 25
$45.6M
Q4 24
$47.6M
Q3 24
$51.9M
Q2 24
$48.7M
Q1 24
$50.2M
Q4 23
$50.8M
Net Profit
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
$-54.4M
Q2 25
$-6.1M
Q1 25
$5.8M
Q4 24
$147.4M
Q3 24
$-15.6M
Q2 24
$1.3M
Q1 24
$6.2M
Q4 23
$9.3M
Operating Margin
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
-102.5%
Q2 25
-10.3%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
-29.6%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
Q4 23
Net Margin
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
-106.3%
Q2 25
-12.9%
Q1 25
12.8%
Q4 24
309.9%
Q3 24
-30.1%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
12.4%
Q4 23
18.3%
EPS (diluted)
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
$-1.23
Q2 25
$-0.14
Q1 25
$0.13
Q4 24
$3.24
Q3 24
$-0.35
Q2 24
$0.03
Q1 24
$0.14
Q4 23
$0.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$228.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.1M
$557.1M
Total Assets
$1.6B
$722.9M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Total Debt
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$646.4M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
$873.4M
Stockholders' Equity
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
$470.1M
Q2 25
$539.6M
Q1 25
$571.0M
Q4 24
$579.5M
Q3 24
$436.5M
Q2 24
$475.2M
Q1 24
$484.6M
Q4 23
$483.0M
Total Assets
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
$1.6B
Q2 25
$1.6B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.4B
Q4 23
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.12×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
1.81×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$20.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
$20.0M
Q2 25
$23.4M
Q1 25
$15.6M
Q4 24
$96.1M
Q3 24
$17.6M
Q2 24
$19.9M
Q1 24
$16.6M
Q4 23
$18.6M
Cash Conversion
PLYM
PLYM
RERE
RERE
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
2.67×
Q4 24
0.65×
Q3 24
Q2 24
15.12×
Q1 24
2.67×
Q4 23
2.01×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons