vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $51.2M, roughly 2.0× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). Latham Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -106.3%, a 99.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
PLYM vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.2M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $-54.4M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | -102.5% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | -106.3% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.4% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -248.5% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.6M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-54.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -102.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 309.9% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.24 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.1M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.4M | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.1M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.6M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.0M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.5M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.5M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.2M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.6M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.12× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.1M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.12× | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.67× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
