vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) and SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC (SYPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $30.3M, roughly 1.7× SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC). SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC runs the higher net margin — -12.9% vs -106.3%, a 93.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.4% vs -9.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -7.7%).
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
Sypris Solutions Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered provider of highly engineered components and specialized technical services, primarily serving aerospace, defense, automotive and commercial industrial markets. It delivers custom manufacturing, performance testing, and value-added engineering support for mission-critical systems and parts for global enterprise clients.
PLYM vs SYPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.2M | $30.3M |
| Net Profit | $-54.4M | $-3.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 4.6% |
| Operating Margin | -102.5% | -10.9% |
| Net Margin | -106.3% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.4% | -9.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -248.5% | -2992.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | $-0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $29.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.6M | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-54.4M | $517.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $-899.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $135.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $390.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $16.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -102.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.9% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 309.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.24 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.1M | $17.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $107.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.5M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.6M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $112.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $105.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $110.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $119.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $121.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $124.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $129.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-6.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $-178.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-390.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $941.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | 17.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.12× | 385.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.67× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
SYPR
| Sypris Electronics | $17.7M | 59% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.5M | 41% |
