vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PERRIGO Co plc (PRGO) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× PERRIGO Co plc). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs -127.8%, a 149.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snap-on posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -2.5%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $148.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Snap-on's revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs 1.3%).
Perrigo Company plc is an American Irish-registered manufacturer of private label over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, and while 70% of Perrigo's net sales are from the U.S. healthcare system, Perrigo is legally headquartered in Ireland for tax purposes, which accounts for 0.60% of net sales. In 2013, Perrigo completed the sixth-largest US corporate tax inversion in history when it reregistered its tax status to Ireland to avoid U.S. corporate taxes. Perrigo maintains its corporate headquarters ...
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
PRGO vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -116.0% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | -127.8% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3093.9% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-10.23 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-1.4B | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.4M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-44.4M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-108.4M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -116.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.1% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -127.8% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.2% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-10.23 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.79 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.5B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $432.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $409.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $558.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $542.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $658.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.4M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $148.6M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.4% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.1M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.4M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.7M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.9M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.5M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.6M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.2M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.7M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-90.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $274.9M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.9M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.5M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.2% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.4% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.89× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.70× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRGO
| Consumer Self Care Americas | $697.0M | 63% |
| Digestive Health | $123.9M | 11% |
| Nutrition | $108.3M | 10% |
| Healthy Lifestyle | $94.8M | 9% |
| Pain And Sleep Aids | $87.1M | 8% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
