vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($168.3M vs $113.6M, roughly 1.5× SITIME Corp). On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (88.3% vs 2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.9% CAGR vs 4.9%).
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
PRK vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.3M | $113.6M |
| Net Profit | $42.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.2% |
| Net Margin | 25.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 88.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.3M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.5M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.7M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.3M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $43.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $-26.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | -73.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | -61.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.92 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.97 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.60 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.35 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $-1.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.5M | $498.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $498.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $692.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $878.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $191.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 114.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.8M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $-181.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.7M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 114.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.0% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | -6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.65× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
