vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK) and VICOR CORP (VICR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($168.3M vs $113.0M, roughly 1.5× VICOR CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 18.3%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VICOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, VICOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.7% CAGR vs 4.9%).
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
Vicor Corporation is a manufacturer of power modules headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts.
PRK vs VICR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.3M | $113.0M |
| Net Profit | $42.6M | $20.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 59.7% |
| Net Margin | 25.3% | 18.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 713.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.3M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.5M | $110.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.7M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $96.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.3M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $85.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $-1.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | 47.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | -1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.92 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.97 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.60 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.35 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.5M | $404.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $754.1M |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $804.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $404.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.5M | $402.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | $362.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.6M | $296.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.6M | $277.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.7M | $267.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $251.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $754.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $711.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $630.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $608.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $580.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $570.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $537.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $804.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9B | $710.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $693.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $665.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $641.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $632.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $613.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $191.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 114.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.7M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.7M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 114.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 61.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.65× | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 7.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
VICR
| Product revenue | $98.0M | 87% |
| Royalty revenue | $15.0M | 13% |
