vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Prelude Therapeutics Inc (PRLD) and SOLESENCE, INC. (SLSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

SOLESENCE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5M vs $6.5M, roughly 1.9× Prelude Therapeutics Inc). SOLESENCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.3% vs -303.5%, a 304.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Prelude Therapeutics Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (116.7% vs -0.7%).

PRLD vs SLSN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SLSN
SLSN
1.9× larger
SLSN
$12.5M
$6.5M
PRLD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRLD
PRLD
+117.3% gap
PRLD
116.7%
-0.7%
SLSN
Higher net margin
SLSN
SLSN
304.8% more per $
SLSN
1.3%
-303.5%
PRLD

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Revenue
$6.5M
$12.5M
Net Profit
$-19.7M
$163.0K
Gross Margin
27.5%
Operating Margin
-314.1%
1.5%
Net Margin
-303.5%
1.3%
Revenue YoY
116.7%
-0.7%
Net Profit YoY
38.9%
129.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.26
$0.00

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
$12.5M
Q3 25
$6.5M
$14.6M
Q2 25
$20.4M
Q1 25
$14.6M
Q4 24
$12.6M
Q3 24
$3.0M
$16.9M
Q2 24
$13.0M
Q1 24
$9.9M
Net Profit
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
$163.0K
Q3 25
$-19.7M
$-1.1M
Q2 25
$2.7M
Q1 25
$80.0K
Q4 24
$-559.0K
Q3 24
$-32.3M
$3.0M
Q2 24
$856.0K
Q1 24
$893.0K
Gross Margin
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
27.5%
Q3 25
23.1%
Q2 25
28.9%
Q1 25
23.1%
Q4 24
22.0%
Q3 24
36.2%
Q2 24
28.7%
Q1 24
36.3%
Operating Margin
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
1.5%
Q3 25
-314.1%
-5.4%
Q2 25
9.4%
Q1 25
1.8%
Q4 24
-1.8%
Q3 24
-1145.9%
19.0%
Q2 24
8.0%
Q1 24
11.3%
Net Margin
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
1.3%
Q3 25
-303.5%
-7.7%
Q2 25
13.1%
Q1 25
0.5%
Q4 24
-4.4%
Q3 24
-1075.7%
18.1%
Q2 24
6.6%
Q1 24
9.0%
EPS (diluted)
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
$0.00
Q3 25
$-0.26
$-0.02
Q2 25
$0.04
Q1 25
$0.00
Q4 24
$0.00
Q3 24
$-0.43
$0.04
Q2 24
$0.01
Q1 24
$0.02

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$55.0M
$1.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$58.5M
$17.6M
Total Assets
$94.8M
$50.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
$1.3M
Q3 25
$55.0M
$429.0K
Q2 25
$4.1M
Q1 25
$1.8M
Q4 24
$1.4M
Q3 24
$153.6M
$2.9M
Q2 24
$2.4M
Q1 24
$2.0M
Stockholders' Equity
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
$17.6M
Q3 25
$58.5M
$17.2M
Q2 25
$18.2M
Q1 25
$15.2M
Q4 24
$14.9M
Q3 24
$156.4M
$15.2M
Q2 24
$11.9M
Q1 24
$5.0M
Total Assets
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
$50.1M
Q3 25
$94.8M
$54.0M
Q2 25
$60.0M
Q1 25
$57.0M
Q4 24
$50.0M
Q3 24
$197.2M
$48.0M
Q2 24
$40.8M
Q1 24
$38.5M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-19.1M
$1.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
11.16×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
$1.8M
Q3 25
$-19.1M
$-2.5M
Q2 25
$-654.0K
Q1 25
$-7.2M
Q4 24
$2.2M
Q3 24
$-27.3M
$4.2M
Q2 24
$-565.0K
Q1 24
$-3.9M
Free Cash Flow
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$-404.0K
Q3 24
$-27.4M
$2.8M
Q2 24
$-1.0M
Q1 24
$-3.9M
FCF Margin
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
-3.2%
Q3 24
-912.0%
16.6%
Q2 24
-8.0%
Q1 24
-39.9%
Capex Intensity
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
20.6%
Q3 24
2.1%
8.3%
Q2 24
3.7%
Q1 24
0.9%
Cash Conversion
PRLD
PRLD
SLSN
SLSN
Q4 25
11.16×
Q3 25
Q2 25
-0.25×
Q1 25
-90.26×
Q4 24
Q3 24
1.38×
Q2 24
-0.66×
Q1 24
-4.32×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons