vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) and TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $13.2M, roughly 2.0× TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -73.9%, a 91.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (59.8% vs 21.7%). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.6M vs $-2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (43.0% CAGR vs 22.6%).
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on advancing immuno-oncology and interventional oncology solutions. It develops proprietary targeted drug delivery technologies designed to improve treatment efficacy for patients with liver, pancreatic and other hard-to-treat solid tumors, primarily operating in North American markets via partnerships with clinical care and research institutions.
PSTL vs TLSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $13.2M |
| Net Profit | $4.6M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | -24.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | -73.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.7% | 59.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.0K | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.0K | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 86.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 83.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.0% |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | -65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | -79.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.2% | -91.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -118.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | -111.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | -180.8% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | -73.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | -93.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -73.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | -113.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | -122.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -204.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $361.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $285.2M | $-33.9M |
| Total Assets | $759.1M | $35.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.0K | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $970.0K | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $361.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $347.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $328.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $285.2M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.9M | $-26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.8M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.5M | $-34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.3M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.6M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.5M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $-36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $759.1M | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.2M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $689.8M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.8M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $615.1M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $608.2M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $584.1M | $17.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $44.5M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.6M | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 144.5% | -19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.7% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.6M | $-19.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $37.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | 144.5% | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.1% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.8% | -66.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.9% | -57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 143.8% | -69.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.6% | -149.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | -183.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | -169.3% |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
