vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pyxis Tankers Inc. (PXS) and Recon Technology, Ltd (RCON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pyxis Tankers Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.0M vs $12.2M, roughly 1.4× Recon Technology, Ltd). Pyxis Tankers Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.3% vs -6.8%, a 38.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Pyxis Tankers Inc. is an international maritime transport enterprise specializing in seaborne shipping of refined petroleum products and other bulk liquid cargoes. It operates a fleet of modern product tankers, serving global energy markets, with core business covering major trade routes across the Atlantic, Mediterranean and Asia-Pacific regions.
Recon Instruments Inc. was a Canadian technology company that produced smartglasses and wearable displays marketed by the company as "heads-up displays" for sports. Recon's products delivered live activity metrics, GPS maps, and notifications directly to the user's eye. Recon's first heads-up display offering was released commercially in October 2010, roughly a year and a half before Google introduced Google Glass.
PXS vs RCON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.0M | $12.2M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-832.7K |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | -14.6% |
| Net Margin | 31.3% | -6.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 111.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 70.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | $17.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-832.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 22 | $5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -63.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -50.4% | ||
| Q3 22 | 37.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -48.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -49.8% | ||
| Q3 22 | 31.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.16 | ||
| Q3 22 | $0.44 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.3M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $67.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $54.9M | $66.4M |
| Total Assets | $138.1M | $77.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $67.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $66.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | $54.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 22 | $138.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 1.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.4M | $-1.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.45× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-931.0K | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
