vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of QUALYS, INC. (QLYS) and TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($324.0M vs $175.3M, roughly 1.8× QUALYS, INC.). QUALYS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 22.8%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.5% vs 10.1%). Over the past eight quarters, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 9.6%).
Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.
Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.
QLYS vs TCBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $175.3M | $324.0M |
| Net Profit | $53.1M | $73.8M |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 30.3% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 15.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.9% | 56.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.47 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $324.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | $327.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $340.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.1M | $307.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.9M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $229.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.7M | $267.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.3M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.3M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.5M | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $-61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 83.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.6% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | -63.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.3% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | -48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.47 | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.39 | $2.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.29 | $1.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.29 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $1.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $250.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $878.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $561.2M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $250.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $620.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $620.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $620.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $660.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $660.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $660.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $660.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $561.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $508.2M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $449.6M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $427.8M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $33.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $31.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $32.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $999.5M | $31.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.5M | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $973.5M | $30.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.3M | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.6M | $29.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $74.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 42.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $304.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.7M | $360.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.6M | $368.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | $480.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $332.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.8M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | $347.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.5M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.9M | $415.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.6M | $317.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.8% | 106.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 180.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 253.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.42× | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.80× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | 6.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
QLYS
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $88.6M | 51% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $86.7M | 49% |
TCBI
Segment breakdown not available.
