vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($290.0K vs $198.0K, roughly 1.5× Quantum Computing Inc.). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -785.9%, a 22.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Quantum Computing Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (219.4% vs -46.5%). Sintx Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-12.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Quantum Computing Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.0% CAGR vs -35.0%).
Rigetti Computing, Inc. is a Berkeley, California-based developer of superconducting quantum integrated circuits used for quantum computers. Rigetti also develops a cloud platform called Forest that enables programmers to write quantum algorithms.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
QUBT vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $198.0K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | -49.5% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -11220.2% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -785.9% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 219.4% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 97.0% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $198.0K | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.0K | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.0K | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.0K | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0K | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $183.0K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-36.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-51.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.7M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | -49.5% | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.8% | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.7% | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -11220.2% | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2709.4% | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16673.8% | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14375.8% | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5384.2% | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2878.1% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | -785.9% | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 620.3% | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -59806.6% | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82640.3% | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5618.8% | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2838.3% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.53 | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $555.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $348.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $877.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $898.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.0M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.2M | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6147.5% | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 583.8% | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-37.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.6M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.5M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -6147.5% | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3000.3% | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11683.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10709.7% | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5040.6% | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2782.0% | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | 583.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 723.2% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1678.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4622.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 508.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 588.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.67× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
