vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RYDER SYSTEM INC (R) and Sea Ltd (SE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sea Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.9B vs $3.1B, roughly 7.3× RYDER SYSTEM INC). Sea Ltd runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 3.0%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sea Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (363.4% vs 1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Sea Ltd's revenue compounded faster (147.8% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.
Sea Limited is a tech conglomerate headquartered in Singapore. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with revenue of US$16.8 billion (2024). Sea currently functions as a holding company for Garena, Monee and Shopee, the largest e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia.
R vs SE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.1B | $22.9B |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $1.6B |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | 363.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.34 | $2.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $93.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.0M | $375.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.0M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.34 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.22 | $2.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.32 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.13 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.27 | $0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.24 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.84 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $12.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $29.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $182.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.0M | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.0M | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $29.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.09× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $583.0M | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $273.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.27× | 3.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $595.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $583.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $749.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $442.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $752.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $651.0M | $756.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $629.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $552.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-85.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-201.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-87.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.67× | 3.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.20× | 9.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.74× | 5.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
R
| Fleet Management Solutions | $1.5B | 47% |
| ChoiceLease | $878.0M | 28% |
| Dedicated Transportation Solutions | $553.0M | 18% |
| Commercial rental | $211.0M | 7% |
SE
Segment breakdown not available.
