vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RYDER SYSTEM INC (R) and SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RYDER SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.9× SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc). SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 13.7% vs 3.0%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs 1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
R vs SSNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.1B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $226.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 13.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.1% | 6.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.34 | $0.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $93.0M | $226.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $180.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.0M | $248.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.0M | $190.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 22.6% |
| Q1 26 | 3.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | $2.34 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.22 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.32 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.13 | $0.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.27 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.09 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.24 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.84 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $420.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | — | $20.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $182.0M | $420.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.0M | $462.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.0M | $388.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | $480.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.0M | $515.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.0M | $567.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.0M | $694.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.0M | $462.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5B | $19.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5B | $19.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.09× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $583.0M | $299.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $273.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.27× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $595.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $583.0M | $299.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $749.0M | $643.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $442.0M | $456.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $752.0M | $372.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $651.0M | $272.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $558.0M | $486.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $629.0M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $552.0M | $384.9M |
| Q1 26 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | $633.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-85.0M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.0M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.0M | $259.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-201.0M | $466.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $310.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-87.0M | $374.9M |
| Q1 26 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.3% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.7% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | 13.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | 6.27× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.67× | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.20× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.74× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.64× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.13× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.43× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.35× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
R
| Fleet Management Solutions | $1.5B | 47% |
| ChoiceLease | $878.0M | 28% |
| Dedicated Transportation Solutions | $553.0M | 18% |
| Commercial rental | $211.0M | 7% |
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
