vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RYDER SYSTEM INC (R) and Texas Instruments (TXN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Texas Instruments is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.4B vs $13.1B, roughly 1.4× RYDER SYSTEM INC). Texas Instruments runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 0.7%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Texas Instruments posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.6% vs 1.0%). Texas Instruments produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.4B vs $273.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Texas Instruments's revenue compounded faster (119.6% CAGR vs 102.9%).
Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) is an American multinational semiconductor company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is one of the top 10 semiconductor companies worldwide based on sales volume. The company's focus is on developing analog chips and embedded processors, which account for more than 80% of its revenue. TI also produces digital light processing (DLP) technology and education technology products including calculators, microcontrollers, and multi-core processors.
R vs TXN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.1B | $18.4B |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $1.5B |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | 18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.1% | 31.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.34 | $1.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $13.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $93.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 35.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 32.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 32.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 28.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | $2.34 | $1.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.22 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.32 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.13 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.27 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.09 | $1.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.24 | $1.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.84 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.0M | $5.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $16.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $34.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.84× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $182.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $198.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.0M | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.0M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.0M | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.0M | $9.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3B | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $12.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5B | $13.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | $16.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $16.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $17.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5B | $35.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5B | $34.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4B | $33.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7B | $35.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5B | $35.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4B | $35.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.24× | 0.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.35× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.27× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.21× | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.14× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.17× | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.09× | 0.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $583.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $273.0M | $1.4B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.1% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.27× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $595.0M | $4.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $583.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $749.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $442.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $752.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $651.0M | $849.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $558.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $629.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $552.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $273.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-85.0M | $993.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.0M | $-274.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-201.0M | $806.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $416.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-87.0M | $507.0M |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | -6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.3% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.7% | 13.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.6% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 27.8% |
| Q1 26 | 6.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.67× | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.20× | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.74× | 1.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.64× | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.13× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.43× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.35× | 1.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
