vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ralliant Corp (RAL) and SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (SEDG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ralliant Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($554.6M vs $335.4M, roughly 1.7× SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -39.4% vs -220.4%, a 181.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (70.9% vs 1.2%).
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is an Israeli company that developed a DC optimized inverter system.
RAL vs SEDG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $554.6M | $335.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.2B | $-132.1M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | -220.4% | -39.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.2% | 70.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 54.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-12.10 | $-2.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $554.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $335.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.1M | $340.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $503.3M | $289.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $219.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.7M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.7M | $265.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-132.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.9M | $-50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $-124.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-98.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-287.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.9M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $-130.8M |
| Q1 26 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | -309.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.5% | -4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | -39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -134.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | -471.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | -60.4% |
| Q1 26 | -220.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -39.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | -43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -146.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | -522.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | -49.3% |
| Q1 26 | $-12.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $-2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $-21.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $-2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $318.8M | $493.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $427.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $318.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $493.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.2M | $498.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.6M | $758.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $651.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $585.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $678.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $689.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $427.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $479.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $594.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $658.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $930.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $397.6M | $52.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $43.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $80.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $397.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.6M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $33.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-44.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.6M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-136.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -58.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -25.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RAL
Segment breakdown not available.
SEDG
| Other | $197.7M | 59% |
| Europe Except Netherlands | $99.4M | 30% |
| Others | $38.2M | 11% |
