vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. (REYN) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.8× Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs 4.2%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 1.2%). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($200.0M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.4% CAGR vs 2.3%).
The Rival Company is an American manufacturer of small appliances that produces products under the Bionaire, Crock-Pot, Fasco, Patton, Pollenex, Rival, Simer, and White Mountain brands. It became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holmes Products Corp. in 1999, and later became a brand of Sunbeam Products, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation, which purchased Holmes in 2005. Jarden, in turn, merged with Newell Rubbermaid in 2016. It is now part of the Newell Brands company.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
REYN vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $118.0M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 11.4% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.2% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1.7% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $931.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $938.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $818.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $910.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $930.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $833.0M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $118.0M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.0M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $97.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.0M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.1% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.46 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $147.0M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $147.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.0M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.79× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.84× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.87× | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.92× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $237.0M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $200.0M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.3% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.01× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $316.0M | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $237.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.0M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.0M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.0M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.0M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.01× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.25× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.44× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.87× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.02× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
REYN
| Reynolds Cooking And Baking | $397.0M | 38% |
| Hefty Waste And Storage | $247.0M | 24% |
| Tableware Products | $229.0M | 22% |
| Presto Products | $164.0M | 16% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
