vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ulta Beauty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.1× Rocket Companies, Inc.). Ulta Beauty runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 2.5%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rocket Companies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (52.2% vs 12.9%). Ulta Beauty produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-81.6M vs $-1.3B). Over the past eight quarters, Rocket Companies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (39.5% CAGR vs 7.2%).
Rocket Companies, Inc., is an American fintech and homeownership services company. Founded by Dan Gilbert and based in Downtown Detroit, Michigan, the company is one of the largest mortgage lenders in the United States through its flagship subsidiary Rocket Mortgage. Its subsidiaries include Redfin, Forsalebyowner.com, and Rocket Money.
Ulta Beauty, Inc., formerly known as Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc. and before 2000 as Ulta3, is an American chain of cosmetic stores headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Ulta Beauty carries both high- and low-end cosmetics, fragrances, nail products, bath and body products, beauty tools and haircare products. Each location has a beauty salon available to the public.
RKT vs ULTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $68.0M | $230.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 2.5% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 52.2% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.8% | -4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $5.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $646.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | $68.0M | $230.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.9M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $305.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.9M | $242.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $313.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $394.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.9% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.4% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.4% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | 37.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -76.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $5.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $6.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $5.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $6.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $8.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.7B | $204.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.9B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $60.7B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $454.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $177.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $414.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $524.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $861.4M | $766.6M |
| Q4 25 | $22.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $60.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.6B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2B | $5.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2B | $5.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.3B | $-81.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -47.2% | -2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -18.08× | 0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-4.0B | $-92.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.2B | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-50.3M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9B | $220.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-797.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $-56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-122.3M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-1.3B | $-81.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-71.8M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9B | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-811.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $-171.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4B | $104.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-138.3M | $68.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0B | $994.0M |
| Q4 25 | -47.2% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -137.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.1% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -209.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -218.7% | 28.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | -18.08× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.42× | -0.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | -94.46× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | -185.80× | 2.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RKT
| Other | $1.4B | 51% |
| Direct To Customer Segment | $945.8M | 35% |
| Partner Network Segment | $216.7M | 8% |
| Subscription Revenue | $91.3M | 3% |
| Closing Fees | $47.1M | 2% |
| Appraisal Revenue | $10.7M | 0% |
ULTA
Segment breakdown not available.
