vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) and Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sachem Capital Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.0M vs $7.0M, roughly 1.7× Relay Therapeutics, Inc.).
Relay Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing precision oncology therapies. It leverages advanced computational modeling of protein dynamics, paired with cutting-edge experimental biology, to design targeted medicines for previously intractable cancer types, serving global oncology care markets and patient populations.
Sachem Capital Corp.SACHEarnings & Financial Report
Sachem Head Capital Management is an American value-oriented investment management firm based in New York City, managed by Scott Ferguson.
RLAY vs SACH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.0M | $12.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $997.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 8.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -18.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 119.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $16.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-74.1M | $997.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-77.1M | $904.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-88.1M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-92.2M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-81.4M | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1105.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -131.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -903.0% | 25.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1003.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -335.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -34.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -813.3% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.43 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.46 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.63 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.62 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $84.0M | $12.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $567.1M | $175.6M |
| Total Assets | $621.3M | $484.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.5M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $152.9M | $56.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $230.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $230.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $264.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $264.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $288.4M |
| Q4 25 | $567.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $607.7M | $175.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $177.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $721.1M | $179.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.8M | $181.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $838.9M | $220.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.7M | $230.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $745.8M | $237.4M |
| Q4 25 | $621.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.0M | $484.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $501.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $799.4M | $491.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $871.3M | $492.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $930.1M | $555.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $772.5M | $586.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $841.4M | $626.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-235.5M | $4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-235.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3370.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-622.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-235.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-62.1M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $501.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-73.2M | $191.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-249.1M | $12.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-65.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.3M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-235.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-62.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-73.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-251.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-65.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -3370.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -958.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -520.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
