vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($71.1M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.8× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 2.0%, a 52.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -1.8%). RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($33.5M vs $14.4M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs -4.7%).
RE/MAX is an international real estate franchise operating in over 100 countries and territories that, in 2015, had over 100,000 agents in 6,800 offices.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
RMAX vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.1M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.4M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.8% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -75.2% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $71.1M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.5M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.5M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.3M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $966.0K | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.0% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.3% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.7M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $432.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $452.4M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $582.5M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.96× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $118.7M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.3M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.1M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.6M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.1M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.1M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $432.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $434.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $435.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $452.4M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.1M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $442.4M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $433.5M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $429.5M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.1M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.4M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $412.0M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $582.5M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $582.2M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.4M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.6M | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $578.6M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $571.4M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $566.7M | $527.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $40.9M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $33.5M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 47.1% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.4% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 28.39× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $56.8M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.9M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $33.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.3M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 47.1% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.2% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 28.39× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.45× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.28× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.22× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.29× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RMAX
| Franchising Segment | $50.1M | 70% |
| Broker Fees | $13.9M | 20% |
| Annual Dues | $7.4M | 10% |
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
