vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. (RMBI) and TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.2M vs $13.1M, roughly 1.0× Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc.). Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.1% vs -73.9%, a 100.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (59.8% vs 18.1%). Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.6M vs $-2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (43.0% CAGR vs 9.1%).
Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating primarily in Indiana. It offers a full range of personal and commercial banking solutions including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, small business lending, and wealth management services, serving local retail consumers and small-to-medium enterprise clients via its regional branch network.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on advancing immuno-oncology and interventional oncology solutions. It develops proprietary targeted drug delivery technologies designed to improve treatment efficacy for patients with liver, pancreatic and other hard-to-treat solid tumors, primarily operating in North American markets via partnerships with clinical care and research institutions.
RMBI vs TLSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.1M | $13.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.4M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.8% |
| Net Margin | 26.1% | -73.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.1% | 59.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.7% | 3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 86.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 83.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -79.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -91.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -118.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -111.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -180.8% |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | -73.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | -93.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.0% | -73.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.2% | -113.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | -122.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.0% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | -204.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.36 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $-0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $33.1M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $145.8M | $-33.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $35.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.3M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.3M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $145.8M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.0M | $-26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $132.3M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $-34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.9M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.1M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $132.4M | $-36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $17.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.0M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.6M | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.9% | -19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.4% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $26.7M | $-19.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | 111.9% | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.2% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | -66.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | -57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 129.3% | -69.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | -149.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.2% | -183.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.7% | -169.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.91× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
