vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ResMed (RMD) and WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP (WTFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ResMed is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $713.2M, roughly 2.0× WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP). WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 27.6%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ResMed posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs 10.9%). Over the past eight quarters, WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 7.8%).
ResMed Inc. is a medical equipment company based in San Diego, California, and founded in Australia. It primarily provides cloud-connectable medical devices for the treatment of sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other respiratory conditions. Resmed produced hundreds of thousands of ventilators and bilevel devices to help treat the respiratory symptoms of patients with COVID-19.
Wintrust is a financial holding company in the United States that operates 15 chartered community banks in northern Illinois and southern Wisconsin. Wintrust is usually classified as a medium-sized banking institution in the United States and it trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market with stock symbol WTFC. Wintrust is the second largest banking company in Chicago.
RMD vs WTFC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $713.2M |
| Net Profit | $392.6M | $227.4M |
| Gross Margin | 61.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 27.6% | 31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | 10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.68 | $3.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | $713.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $697.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $670.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $643.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $638.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $615.7M |
| Q2 26 | $392.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $398.7M | $227.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $348.5M | $216.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.7M | $195.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $365.0M | $189.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $344.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $311.4M | $170.0M |
| Q2 26 | 61.8% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 62.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.6% | — |
| Q2 26 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.0% | 39.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.6% | 37.8% |
| Q2 26 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 27.9% | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.1% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.3% | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | 27.6% |
| Q2 26 | $2.68 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.74 | $3.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.68 | $3.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.37 | $2.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.58 | $2.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.48 | $2.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.34 | $2.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.11 | $2.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $663.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.3B | $7.4B |
| Total Assets | $8.5B | $72.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.11× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $932.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $521.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $426.4M | — |
| Q2 26 | $663.8M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $664.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $403.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $663.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $662.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $667.6M | — |
| Q2 26 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $6.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $6.4B |
| Q2 26 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $8.8B | $72.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.5B | $71.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3B | $69.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2B | $69.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $65.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $64.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | $63.8B |
| Q2 26 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.