vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ROGERS CORP (ROG) and SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. (SWBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $124.7M, roughly 1.6× SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs 1.5%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -3.9%). SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.3M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, ROGERS CORP's revenue compounded faster (-3.3% CAGR vs -4.8%).
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
ROG vs SWBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $200.5M | $124.7M |
| Net Profit | $4.5M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | -3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 421.4% | -53.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.5M | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.0M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.8M | $140.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.5M | $115.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.2M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.3M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.2M | $159.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-500.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $27.9M |
| Q1 26 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.1% | 35.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 17.4% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 17.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.00 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.44 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $195.8M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $363.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $548.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $195.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.8M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.6M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.8M | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.4M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.9M | $60.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $364.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $372.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $366.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $371.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $380.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $399.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $548.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $559.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $578.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $571.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $577.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | $27.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $16.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.5% | 13.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 8.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.29× | 14.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $70.1M | $21.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.4M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $43.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $-35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $38.2M |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | -40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 24.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.20× | 14.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.