vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ROGERS CORP (ROG) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T1 Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $200.5M, roughly 1.0× ROGERS CORP). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -62.0%, a 64.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $1.1M).
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
ROG vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $200.5M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $4.5M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 421.4% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.0M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.8M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.5M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.3M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.2M | $0 |
| Q1 26 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.6M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-500.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $-27.0M |
| Q1 26 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.3% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.3% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.00 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.44 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $195.8M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $195.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.8M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.2M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.6M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.4M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.9M | $219.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $561.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $644.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.5% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $70.1M | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.9M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.4M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $-28.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $-35.6M |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
