vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Roper Technologies (ROP) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Viking Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.9× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 12.9%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
ROP vs VIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $4.0B |
| Net Profit | $331.0M | $514.0M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | 15.2% |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 842.6% | 35.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.87 | $1.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $718.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $398.5M | $514.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $378.3M | $439.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.1M | $-105.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.9M | $379.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.1M | $159.8M |
| Q1 26 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.5% | 73.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.2% | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.2% | 74.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.5% | 57.8% |
| Q1 26 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $4.87 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.97 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.68 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.49 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.12 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $382.9M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8B | $803.5M |
| Total Assets | $34.6B | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $382.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $242.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.8M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.5M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $18.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0B | $803.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | $278.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2B | $-267.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $-688.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $-1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $34.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $663.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $507.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $738.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.5M | $663.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $470.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $587.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $722.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.4M | $828.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.1M | $419.8M |
| Q1 26 | $507.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.18× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 2.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
