vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 4.2%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 1.7%). Science Applications International Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($120.0M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
SAIC vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.62× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
