vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOUTHERN COPPER CORP (SCCO) and Sea Ltd (SE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sea Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.9B vs $3.9B, roughly 5.9× SOUTHERN COPPER CORP). SOUTHERN COPPER CORP runs the higher net margin — 33.9% vs 7.0%, a 26.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sea Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (363.4% vs 39.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Sea Ltd's revenue compounded faster (147.8% CAGR vs 22.0%).
Southern Copper Corporation, organized in Delaware and headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, owns copper mines, smelters, and refineries in Peru and Mexico, including the Cuajone mine, the Toquepala mine, and the Tia Maria mine in Peru and the Buenavista mine and the La Caridad Mine in Mexico. In 2024, the company mined 2.1 billion pounds of copper, 21 million ounces of silver, 64 million pounds of molybdenum, and 286 million pounds of zinc.
Sea Limited is a tech conglomerate headquartered in Singapore. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with revenue of US$16.8 billion (2024). Sea currently functions as a holding company for Garena, Monee and Shopee, the largest e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia.
SCCO vs SE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $22.9B |
| Net Profit | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Gross Margin | 62.0% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 54.5% | 8.7% |
| Net Margin | 33.9% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 39.0% | 363.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 64.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $2.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $375.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $976.7M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $949.1M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $796.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $899.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $953.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $738.8M | $-23.0M |
| Q4 25 | 62.0% | 44.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.8% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.3% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.7% | 46.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.5% | 41.6% |
| Q4 25 | 54.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 33.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | -0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $2.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.21 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.19 | $0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.95 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.0B | $12.6B |
| Total Assets | $21.4B | $29.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.0B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.4B | $29.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | $5.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 27.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.14× | 3.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.4B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $976.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $721.4M | $756.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $962.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $659.7M | $468.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $741.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $403.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $630.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $445.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.14× | 3.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | 9.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 5.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCCO
| Other | $1.3B | 32% |
| MX | $726.4M | 19% |
| CH | $560.4M | 14% |
| PE | $218.8M | 6% |
| Silver | $201.1M | 5% |
| BR | $157.9M | 4% |
| CL | $149.0M | 4% |
| Molybdenum | $143.3M | 4% |
| ES | $130.8M | 3% |
| Mexican IMMSA Unit | $129.8M | 3% |
| IT | $107.1M | 3% |
| Zinc | $88.8M | 2% |
SE
Segment breakdown not available.
