vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $788.1M, roughly 1.4× Zscaler, Inc.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -1.5%, a 15.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zscaler, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 1.7%). Zscaler, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($431.0M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Zscaler, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.5% CAGR vs 3.1%).
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
Zscaler, Inc. is an American cloud security company based in San Jose, California. The company offers cloud-based services to protect enterprise networks and data.
SCI vs ZS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $788.1M |
| Net Profit | $159.4M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | -1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.7% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 3.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.13 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $788.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $719.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $678.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $647.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $628.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $592.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $553.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $525.0M |
| Q4 25 | $159.4M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.5M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.9M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.9M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.8M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.3M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 76.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 76.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.1% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 78.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | 77.7% |
| Q4 25 | 24.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.9% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | -5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.02 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $243.6M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $243.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $227.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.6M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $958.9M |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | 3.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.19× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.87× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.83× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.90× | 1.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $212.9M | $448.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $87.2M | $431.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | 54.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.3% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $554.2M | $924.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $212.9M | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.3M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.4M | $211.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | $179.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.1M | $331.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.8M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $173.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.1M | $142.1M |
| Q4 25 | $87.2M | $431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.7M | $190.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.4M | $138.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.8M | $314.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.8M | $154.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $137.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $140.3M | $111.2M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 25.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 50.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 21.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 9.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
ZS
Segment breakdown not available.
