vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOLESENCE, INC. (SLSN) and Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.0M vs $12.5M, roughly 1.8× SOLESENCE, INC.). Tectonic Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.8% vs 1.3%, a 22.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tectonic Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.9% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (270.5% CAGR vs 12.5%).
Tectonic Financial, Inc.TECTPEarnings & Financial Report
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is a US-based diversified financial services provider. It offers core services including wealth management, investment banking, capital markets advisory, and tailored financial solutions. Its key client segments cover high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and small to mid-sized enterprises across North America.
SLSN vs TECTP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.5M | $23.0M |
| Net Profit | $163.0K | $5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 30.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 23.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.7% | 17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.2% | 15.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | $163.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-559.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.0K | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $893.0K | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.4% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.02 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $17.6M | $119.2M |
| Total Assets | $50.1M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2M | $114.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | $111.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $113.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2M | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $108.5M |
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.0M | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $863.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $847.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $777.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $777.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.8M | $-17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-17.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -74.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 11.16× | -3.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-654.0K | $-32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-565.0K | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-404.0K | $-86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -74.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -163.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | -406.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | -115.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.0% | -165.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.9% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 11.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.25× | -7.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | -90.26× | -8.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.38× | -4.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.66× | -9.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.32× | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
