vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DNA X, Inc. (SONM) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DNA X, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.2M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.1× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -29.3%, a 66.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DNA X, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs -1.5%).
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
SONM vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.2M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-4.8M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -29.3% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -89.2% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.83 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $13.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $458.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-1.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 38.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | -24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -29.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -9.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | -29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -66.8% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -141.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -31.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -10.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-4.83 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.79 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-116.99 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.1M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1M | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-701.0K | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $40.2M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $9.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-701.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $22.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $40.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $56.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.0M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-7.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-417.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-168.0K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-351.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-554.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-198.0K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.8% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
