vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) and Telesat Corp (TSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sprout Social, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.9M vs $73.8M, roughly 1.6× Telesat Corp). Over the past eight quarters, Sprout Social, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -64.0%).
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
Telesat, formerly Telesat Canada, is a Canadian satellite communications company founded on May 2, 1969. The company is headquartered in Ottawa.
SPT vs TSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.9M | $73.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-88.4M |
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 95.3% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | 5.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -119.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.6M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.8M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.3M | $152.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.4M | $363.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.4M | $-88.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.0M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.2M | $-52.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $547.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 77.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | 95.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.7% | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -119.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.7% | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.0% | 150.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $352.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $40.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $203.4M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $523.1M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.6M | $352.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.5M | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.9M | $552.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $523.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $481.4M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $422.9M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.7M | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $428.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.6M | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $389.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $39.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.