vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.0× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs -40.6%, a 57.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs -2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (11.6% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
SSYS vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $137.0M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $-55.6M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -16.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -40.6% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.2% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -109.0% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.0M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.1M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-55.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.6M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.9% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $71.5M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $852.5M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.5M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.1M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.1M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.9M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $852.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $902.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $784.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $831.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.9M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.0K | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |