vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.5× STAG Industrial, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 7.1%, a 20.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
STAG vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $224.2M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | $62.0M | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 27.6% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.1% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $224.2M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $220.9M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.1M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.6M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.6M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.3M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.7M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.8M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | $62.0M | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.8M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 27.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.9M | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.0M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | $7.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | 0.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
