vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) and Yiren Digital Ltd. (YRD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neuronetics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.8M vs $30.1M, roughly 1.4× Yiren Digital Ltd.). Yiren Digital Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 20.4% vs -17.2%, a 37.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Neuronetics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs -59.4%).
Neuronetics is a Malvern, PA based, publicly traded company incorporated in Delaware in April 2003, that develops non-invasive treatments for psychiatric disorders that have shown resistance or lack of improvement using traditional medicine. The treatments are based upon neuromodulation technology.
Yiren Digital Ltd. is a China-based fintech firm that operates integrated digital consumer finance platforms, offering personal installment loans, data-driven credit assessment solutions, and accessible wealth management advisory services primarily to underserved individual users across tier 2 to lower-tier cities in mainland China, leveraging big data and artificial intelligence to enhance risk control and service delivery efficiency.
STIM vs YRD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.8M | $30.1M |
| Net Profit | $-7.2M | $6.2M |
| Gross Margin | 52.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -17.2% | 20.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 85.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.3M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | $29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.4M | $26.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.7M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.9M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -41.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -56.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.0% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -59.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -45.2% | 35.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.44 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.27 | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.1M | $565.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $65.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.4M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $141.6M | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.94× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $558.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9M | $814.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.7M | $814.8M |
| Q4 25 | $65.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $103.8M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 2.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.90× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.08× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $908.0K | $-106.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $692.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-21.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $908.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-785.0K | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.0M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | $692.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-899.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -31.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -71.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
