vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SunOpta Inc. (STKL) and SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILVERCORP METALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($223.8M vs $205.4M, roughly 1.1× SunOpta Inc.). SunOpta Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -1.3%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs 7.4%).
SunOpta, Inc. is a multi-national food and mineral company headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota and founded in 1973 in Canada.
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
STKL vs SVM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $205.4M | $223.8M |
| Net Profit | $816.0K | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | 12.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.4% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 113.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $223.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.5M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $201.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.9M | $172.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.9M | $114.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.5M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $184.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $816.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.7M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.5% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $250.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $162.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $694.1M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $694.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $704.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $690.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $668.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $699.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $704.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $671.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 20.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $36.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.5M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.1M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.6M | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.3M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 28.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.03× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STKL
| Beverages And Broths | $161.4M | 79% |
| Fruit Snacks | $40.9M | 20% |
| Ingredients | $3.1M | 2% |
SVM
Segment breakdown not available.