vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($158.6M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.6× Latham Group, Inc.). Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 71.2% vs -7.0%, a 78.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3661.1% vs 14.5%). Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($131.7M vs $14.1M).
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing innovative RNA-targeted therapies for severe rare genetic diseases. Its lead candidates address unmet needs for Dravet syndrome, a rare epilepsy, and other neurological monogenic disorders, serving patients across North America and global markets.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
STOK vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $158.6M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $112.9M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 70.2% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 71.2% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3661.1% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 528.0% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.90 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.6M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.6M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.9M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.5M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.2% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.4% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.4% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.90 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $274.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $350.1M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $406.9M | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $274.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $350.1M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $229.0M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $406.9M | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $271.6M | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $131.8M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $131.7M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 83.0% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.17× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.8M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.7M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.2M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 83.0% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -102.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STOK
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
