vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.1× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). Walker & Dunlop, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -12.9% vs -16.4%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.4% vs -7.5%). STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-31.3M vs $-680.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally.
STRZ vs WD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $320.9M | $340.0M |
| Net Profit | $-52.6M | $-13.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | -17.2% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.9% | -131.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.15 | $-0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.9M | $337.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | $319.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $237.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.5M | $341.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $292.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.6M | $270.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $228.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.5M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.15 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.54 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.83 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.0M | $299.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $608.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $663.2M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $299.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.6M | $233.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $181.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.5M | $279.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.5M | $208.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $216.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $663.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $712.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-168.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-26.1M | $-664.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.3M | $-680.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.8% | -200.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-317.7M | $-2.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-664.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.1M | $-948.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $-238.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-281.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-335.3M | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $-202.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.5M | $-237.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-680.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $-950.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.5M | $-241.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-284.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-349.3M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $-204.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.4M | $-241.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -200.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | -281.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | -75.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -120.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | -69.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | -89.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -102.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.98× | -10.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
WD
Segment breakdown not available.
