vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Service Properties Trust (SVC) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Service Properties Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($296.5M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.4× T1 Energy Inc.). Service Properties Trust runs the higher net margin — -0.3% vs -62.0%, a 61.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $-95.2M).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
SVC vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $296.5M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $-782.0K | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.0% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $296.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.6M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.4M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.9M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.5M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.2M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $-782.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.9M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.2M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-116.4M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.9M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-73.8M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-78.4M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.4% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.48 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.8M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.5B | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $646.1M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.52× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.4M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.3M | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | $646.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.9M | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $695.9M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.6M | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | 8.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-95.2M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.1% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.9% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-107.0M | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0K | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.2M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-926.0K | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-95.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-77.2M | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | -32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVC
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
