vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Service Properties Trust (SVC) and TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD (TSEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.2M vs $296.5M, roughly 1.2× Service Properties Trust). TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD runs the higher net margin — 15.2% vs -0.3%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.7% vs -17.0%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. is an Israeli company that manufactures integrated circuits using specialty process technologies, including SiGe, BiCMOS, Silicon Photonics, SOI, mixed-signal and RFCMOS, CMOS image sensors, non-imaging sensors, power management (BCD), and non-volatile memory (NVM) as well as MEMS capabilities. Tower Semiconductor also owns 51% of TPSCo, an enterprise with Nuvoton Technology Corporation Japan (NTCJ).
SVC vs TSEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $296.5M | $351.2M |
| Net Profit | $-782.0K | $53.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 15.7% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | 15.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.0% | -1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.0% | 4.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $296.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.5M | $351.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-782.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-116.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-73.8M | $53.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-78.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.8M | $265.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $646.1M | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $265.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $646.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $695.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-95.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-107.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-926.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-95.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-77.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
