vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Service Properties Trust (SVC) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Service Properties Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($296.5M vs $226.2M, roughly 1.3× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -0.3%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.0% vs -17.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
SVC vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $296.5M | $226.2M |
| Net Profit | $-782.0K | $180.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.0% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.0% | -74.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $296.5M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.6M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.4M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.9M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.5M | $212.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-782.0K | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.9M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-116.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-73.8M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-78.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.8M | $158.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $646.1M | — |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $742.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.4M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $332.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $646.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.9M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $695.9M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.6M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.9M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $512.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $631.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-95.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-107.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0K | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.2M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-926.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-95.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-77.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
