vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $296.5M, roughly 1.4× Service Properties Trust). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs -0.3%, a 48.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -17.0%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $-95.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
SVC vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $296.5M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $-782.0K | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.0% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.0% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $296.5M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.6M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.4M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.9M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.5M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.2M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-782.0K | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.9M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.2M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-116.4M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.4M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.9M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-73.8M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-78.4M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.4% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.8% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.1% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.4% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.4% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.0% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.8M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $646.1M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.4M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.3M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $646.1M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.9M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $695.9M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.9M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | 8.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-95.2M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.1% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.9% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-107.0M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0K | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.2M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-926.0K | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-95.2M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.9M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-77.2M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | -32.1% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.9% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.4% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.0% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
