vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($394.6M vs $296.5M, roughly 1.3× Service Properties Trust). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -0.3%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs -17.0%). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($60.9M vs $-95.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (42.3% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
SVC vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $296.5M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $-782.0K | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.0% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.0% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $296.5M | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.6M | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.4M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.9M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.5M | $227.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.2M | $194.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-782.0K | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.2M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-116.4M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.9M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-73.8M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-78.4M | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.1% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.4% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.4% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.0% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.48 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.8M | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.5B | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $646.1M | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.52× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.4M | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.3M | $141.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $646.1M | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.9M | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $695.9M | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.6M | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.9M | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $583.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | $550.3M |
| Q4 25 | 8.52× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.85× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-95.2M | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.1% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.9% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-107.0M | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0K | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.2M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-926.0K | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-95.2M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.9M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-77.2M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | -32.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.0% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
