vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $426.9M, roughly 1.5× Savers Value Village, Inc.). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -3.3%, a 16.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 8.1%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $-6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
SVV vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $426.9M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $-14.0M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | -3.3% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -164.6% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $426.9M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $417.2M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.8M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $386.7M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $354.2M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-467.0K | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.2% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.5M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $750.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $414.6M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.81× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.5M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.7M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.7M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.2M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $750.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $423.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $413.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $421.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $419.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $395.0M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.6M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.3M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.5% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.5% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.5M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $419.0K | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.9M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.8M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.3M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.9M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.6M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.3M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.0% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.88× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.10× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.22× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
