vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.3× Ulta Beauty). Ulta Beauty runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 1.4%, a 6.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ulta Beauty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 0.1%). Stanley Black & Decker produced more free cash flow last quarter ($155.3M vs $-81.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Ulta Beauty's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
Ulta Beauty, Inc., formerly known as Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc. and before 2000 as Ulta3, is an American chain of cosmetic stores headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois. Ulta Beauty carries both high- and low-end cosmetics, fragrances, nail products, bath and body products, beauty tools and haircare products. Each location has a beauty salon available to the public.
SWK vs ULTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $51.4M | $230.9M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.6% | -4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $5.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $230.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.9M | $305.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.9M | $242.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.1M | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.2M | $313.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.5M | $394.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.4% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.8% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | 37.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $5.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $6.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.29 | $5.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.60 | $5.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $6.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $8.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $268.3M | $204.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.0B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $21.8B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $268.3M | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.8M | $454.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.5M | $177.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.7M | $414.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.5M | $524.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $476.6M | $766.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.9B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.69× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $221.2M | $5.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $155.3M | $-81.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | -2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.30× | 0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $369.6M | $-92.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.2M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.3M | $220.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-420.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $679.1M | $-56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $285.8M | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-431.0M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-81.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.7M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-485.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $564.6M | $-171.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.3M | $104.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $485.8M | $68.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-496.7M | $994.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.8% | 28.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.10× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.48× | -0.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.10× | 2.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
ULTA
Segment breakdown not available.
