vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.4× Vertiv Holdings Co). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 1.4%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 0.1%). Vertiv Holdings Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($652.8M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.
SWK vs VRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.6B |
| Net Profit | $51.4M | $390.1M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 30.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.6% | 137.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.9M | $324.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.4M | $164.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.9M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.1M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.2M | $178.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.4% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.8% | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 38.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $0.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.29 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.60 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $268.3M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.3B | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.0B | $4.2B |
| Total Assets | $21.8B | $13.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $268.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.7M | $908.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.5M | $579.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8B | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.5B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5B | $9.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5B | $8.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.59× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 1.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $221.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $155.3M | $652.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | 24.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.30× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $369.6M | $2.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $978.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.2M | $508.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.3M | $322.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-420.0M | $303.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $679.1M | $425.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $285.8M | $378.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.0M | $378.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $652.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $885.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.3M | $463.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.7M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-485.0M | $266.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $564.6M | $364.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.3M | $341.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $485.8M | $344.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.10× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.65× | 1.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.48× | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
VRT
Segment breakdown not available.