vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Venus Concept Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.8M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.2× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -8.2%). TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($589.0K vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
TACT vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -10.1% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0K | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-143.0K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-551.0K | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-319.0K | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 47.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.8% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.2% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.1% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.7% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.6% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.0% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.1% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.4M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $31.1M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $44.8M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.4M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.6M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $44.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.0M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.5M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.2M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.4M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $609.0K | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $589.0K | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.1% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.6M | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $609.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-161.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.0K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $636.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $589.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-171.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.0K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $499.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 242.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TACT
Segment breakdown not available.
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
