vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT) and Zeo Energy Corp. (ZEO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeo Energy Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.6M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.6× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -0.4%). Zeo Energy Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.3M vs $589.0K). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -4.0%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
TACT vs ZEO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $18.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.1% | -11.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -360.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $20.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0K | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-143.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0K | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-435.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-551.0K | $-424.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-319.0K | $-277.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | 47.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.8% | 57.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | 59.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | 99.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.1% | 50.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.7% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.1% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | -153.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.7% | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | -20.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.0% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | -72.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.4M | $6.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $79.1K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $31.1M | $5.3M |
| Total Assets | $44.8M | $56.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.4M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.7M | $68.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $79.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $715.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $787.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $858.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $748.8K |
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.8M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.3M | $-59.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.6M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.4M | $-39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $-53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.6M | $-173.0M |
| Q4 25 | $44.8M | $56.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.0M | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.5M | $46.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.2M | $47.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.4M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $609.0K | $2.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $589.0K | $2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.1% | 12.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.6M | $-9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $609.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-161.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.0K | $162.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $636.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $589.0K | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-171.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.0K | $116.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $499.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-10.4M |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -30.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -51.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 242.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TACT
Segment breakdown not available.
ZEO
| Nonrelated Party | $18.1M | 98% |
| Related Party | $432.1K | 2% |
