vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC (TCI) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.1M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.3× Velo3D, Inc.). TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC runs the higher net margin — 68.8% vs -231.9%, a 300.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -25.2%). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Transcontinental Realty Investors Inc. (TCI) is a U.S.-based real estate investment firm that owns, operates and develops a diversified portfolio of residential, commercial and mixed-use properties across core U.S. regional markets. It pursues long-term value growth via strategic property acquisitions, efficient asset management and tailored leasing solutions for individual and business tenants.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
TCI vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.1M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $8.3M | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -28.9% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | 68.8% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7577.8% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.1M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.9M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $724.0K | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.0K | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.0K | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -28.9% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.3% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.4% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.2% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.2% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | 68.8% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.5% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.4% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.0M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $210.8M | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $846.7M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.25× | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $89.0M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.5M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.6M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.8M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $210.8M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.5M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $212.4M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.2M | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.3M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $178.3M | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $846.7M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.4M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $837.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.3M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $832.3M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $832.2M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $830.4M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $828.9M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.25× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.27× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.22× | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.9M | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.4M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-511.0K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.34× | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
