vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC (TCI) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Venus Concept Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.8M vs $12.1M, roughly 1.1× TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC). TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC runs the higher net margin — 68.8% vs -163.8%, a 232.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS INC's revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Transcontinental Realty Investors Inc. (TCI) is a U.S.-based real estate investment firm that owns, operates and develops a diversified portfolio of residential, commercial and mixed-use properties across core U.S. regional markets. It pursues long-term value growth via strategic property acquisitions, efficient asset management and tailored leasing solutions for individual and business tenants.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
TCI vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.1M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $8.3M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -28.9% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 68.8% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7577.8% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.9M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $724.0K | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.0K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.0K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.3% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.4% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.2% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.2% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 68.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.5% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.4% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.0M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $210.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $846.7M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.25× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $89.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.8M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $210.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $212.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $198.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $178.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $846.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $837.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $832.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $832.2M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $830.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $828.9M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.22× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.9M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.4M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-511.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.34× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TCI
Segment breakdown not available.
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
